Faculty who had been through the program once were influenced in many dimensions of their teaching. For example these kinds of changes in campus teaching were reported by at least half of the respondents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've heard anecdotal reports of such influence for years but we got a 53% response rate. Of those respondents, 85% reported influence on their campus teaching in at least one dimension.
Here's my full report and the survey that was sent to faculty. Feel free to use or adapt the survey; if you're doing so, I'd appreciate it if you'd let me know (ehrmannsteve at gmail.com)
Note: One reason this program of developing summer courses has lasted 15 years, attracting both faculty participation and GW resources to support them, was that teaching online summer courses made money for both the university and for the participating faculty. As faculty interest in developing summer courses increased, GW had the incentive to hire more instructional designers to help them. In effect, improving teaching on campus was being rewarded (via the intervening step of improving teaching, and increasing revenue, online). That fact suggests a policy I'll describe in my next post.
No comments:
Post a Comment